Robert Malone: You Are The Population They Want To Control

The government should not be in the business of population control because it is not their place.

The worldwide birthrate per 1000 people follows a predictable trend.

Birth rates are low in 'developed' or wealthy countries, and high in nations that fall at the bottom of the economic scale.

There's nothing new here

In many countries, such as the US, birthrates are either too low or stable to maintain current population levels. Since 1970, US birth rates have remained stable below 300 million. Some estimates even show a decrease in the population. Immigration is responsible for the entire population growth that has occurred in the US over this period. This is why the USA grew to 336 millions people in just 50 years. The trend has increased over the last few years.

There was a number of

A record number of immigrants - 44,8 million

In 2018, 13.7 percent (or 13 million people) of Americans were immigrants. The number of immigrants in the US has increased by more than four times since 1960 when there were 9.7 million, or 5.4 percent, of the US population.

Jill and myself, growing up in the blue state of California, were taught at a young age that two children would be the responsible way to save our planet from overpopulation. Careers were more important than a large family. Women would be more fulfilled if they pursued a career and education, rather than staying at home. Women should delay motherhood until they have a degree and a stable career. This was the right thing to do. Our government, schools, and corporate media send the same message to young women today.

The message from the US government today is as strong as it was when I was a teenager, between 50 and 60 years ago.

In reality, Agenda 2030 of the UN asserts that immigration is a right.

In practice, this means that people born in countries where the birthrate is high have a legal right to move into countries with a low birthrate.

Migration is not a "human right."

There is a good reason why property laws and nation-states exist. Affirming otherwise would be to claim that there is one world government in charge of migration. UN and WEF usurp authority once again.

Non-citizens are not covered by the laws and regulations of this nation, or even our Constitution.

This was done on purpose. We should abide by the Constitution and Bill of Rights and not UN agreements such as Agenda 2030 which was signed by an American president but never ratified in the Senate.

It has been a great job by our country to convince the American public that a large family size is bad for families and individuals. The reward, good or bad, was a stable population and the preservation of American culture, heritage, and way of life over time. They persist. Kamala Harris stated this week that a smaller population is key to allowing children to breathe and drink water. It is not the first instance that she has made this false claim.


By investing in clean energy, electric vehicles and reducing population we can ensure that more children will be able to breathe clean air and drink water.


Kamala Harris

But, there is still the

Biden border crisis grows ever more urgent

The rate of illegal immigration is on the rise.

If that is their true intention, it's a no-brainer to assume that reducing immigration could be a simple way to reduce the population.

It is true that the US culture is vibrant and incredible. This heritage is built on freedom of speech, shared values and a strong work ethic. Too much immigration can easily dilute this heritage. Look at what's happening in France. The open migration policies have caused a great deal of instability in the country. France can't integrate that many people with so different cultural norms in their national culture. This is not progress.

Globalism weaponizes the diverse cultures of the world to eliminate diversity, paving the way for a globalized, single government, controlled by the UN, and the WEF.

Open borders, UN immigration policies and even Kamala's statements appear to work towards this. It's time to stop this nonsense, and return to an orderly and closed immigration system.

Over 8 billion people live on this planet. The US cannot accept all immigrants. It is a mistake to think otherwise.

America must be an independent, free nation.

Our goods and services must be sourced from Americans. Strong economies are those that meet their own internal needs. When goods, services and medical care are produced in-house. Importing low-wage workers to do the dirty work is not necessary for a strong nation. The absurd directive to reduce the natural born population and import new immigrants has no purpose other than to further globalize America.

Accepting large numbers of immigrants, while decreasing our own American population will further devastate the economy of middle class and urban poor Americans. The new world order, where migration is a human right, borders are opened and the UN controls population flow and ebbs and flows is an affront to American nationalism. It will also destroy the American experiment of self-governance.

Our government should not be involved in enforcing any population control measures.

This brings me to mRNA shots. Some people worry that mRNA shots contain a sequence or component such as a lipid nanoparticle or genetic code which can cause sterility. These were designed to reduce fertility in the world. This isn't a completely unreal fear.

Since years, there has been rumors that anti-fertility and abortion vaccines are being developed in India. There are both arguments in favor and against the rumors. We do know that China has used forced sterilizations, and forced abortions against its own citizens. China is now worried about the rapid decline in its population. It is immoral to restrict family choice by the government.

The idea that a vaccine could be used to control the population is offensive.

This brings me to the newly published


Paper that shows using

Cats can be permanently sterilized using adenoassociated viral vectored methods


In this essay I won't get into the science (we'll leave that for a future essay), but I will discuss the ethics behind developing 'gene-therapy' techniques which rely on viral vectors to sterilize.

In the first place, a technique such as fertility gene therapy using AAV vectors (gene therapy) could be intentionally or accidentally modified to become infectious. It is necessary to perform a recombination (rescue), which may be of a wild-type adenovirus. The viral vector will then be capable of replication, and therefore infectious. AAV vectors for 'genetherapy' are not full-replicating viruses, but in a laboratory setting it is easy to use the whole virus to produce infectious products. This could be as easy as missing a step in purification or a recombination. It would be disastrous if a product like this were to escape and be released in the cat population. It is possible that a virus could be created if a vector has a rescue in an animal injected with it. What if the virus infects other feline species such as cheetahs and big cats? It is possible that it could decimate a species of endangered cats or even all cats. Furthermore,

There is the possibility that a virus of this type could cross species and even infect humans

Adenoassociated viruses can easily spread because they are respiratory viruses. What happens next?

We already know that governments and NGOs are willing to look at ways to reduce population through forced sterilization or vaccination.

Who knows if an organization with the "best of intentions" (or one that believes the "ends justify the means") would go there. It is possible after what we've experienced in the last three years. Bill Gates, Kamala Harris and the UN and WEF have all made it clear what their position is. Population reduction is essential.

Animal and human biological research must be subjected to more regulation.

We must also consider the fact that the government is not really concerned about population control.

Their actions will tell you more about them than their words. They may promote low birthrates as a way to stabilize the population, but they are promoting immigration and allowing a rapid population increase. The DATA indicates that they are really aiming for a New World Order where the UN is the dominant force in the world and nation states are nestled within their organization structure. Out-migration and regional population control through government-assisted birth control (via pharmaceuticals as well as deployed propaganda) are the main goals.

The aim of the program is to enhance that process by allowing populations from economically disadvantaged areas to control more economically developed nations and infrastructure, while simultaneously destroying cultures and political/economic structures that have historically allowed the economic growth of these more advanced areas.

Republished from